The
Federal Reserve has a conflict of interest in its very mandate. The
Dodd-Frank regulation law has tilted the effect of the Fed in many
ways, giving the executive branch of government much more influence
on the Fed.
Despite
the logic for the Fed’s independence, Congress always has wanted to
impose influence. It has to an extent. Since 1978 the Fed has had to
enforce the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act, known as
Humphrey-Hawkins. That conflicts with the Fed’s stated
currency/inflation activity.
The
Humphrey-Hawkins Act enforcement creates an inflating bias; certainly
not one of dollar stability. So there is always a conflict of
interest.
Remember,
the Fed handles monetary policy. The president, through the Treasury
Department, is in control of fiscal policy. It’s difficult for the
Fed to control outlandish spending by the government.(See
the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments and @BusinessNewshole tweets.)
The Federal Reserve has a conflict of interest in its very mandate. The Dodd-Frank regulation law has tilted the effect of the Fed in many ways, giving the executive branch of government much more influence on the Fed.
Despite
the logic for the Fed’s independence, Congress always has wanted to
impose influence. It has to an extent. Since 1978 the Fed has had to
enforce the Full Employment and Balanced Growth Act, known as
Humphrey-Hawkins. That conflicts with the Fed’s stated
currency/inflation activity.
The
Humphrey-Hawkins Act enforcement creates an inflating
bias; certainly not one of dollar stability. So there is always a
conflict of interest.
Remember,
the Fed handles monetary policy. The president, through the Treasury
Department, is in control of fiscal policy. It’s thus difficult for the
Fed to control outlandish spending by the government.(See
the Earl J Weinreb NewsHole® comments and @BusinessNewshole tweets.)
No comments:
Post a Comment