Companies with interests in an industry, may have the greatest financial stake in the regulatory activity of that
agency. They are more likely to attempt to influence that body than would individual consumers. The term applied to the possible outcome is called “regulatory capture.”
Members of the consuming public would have little incentive to try to influence the regulators. We would therefore expect that when regulators assign experts to help review and decide policy, this will lead to opinions of former industry members in contact with that industry.
I feel there are some agencies where industry input is essential. High tech and medical are examples. But it is important that independence be truly and consciously maintained.
This regulatory capture syndrome extends beyond political agencies and organizations into business, media, and popular culture.
The concept of regulatory capture is one of government failure. Yet, the media and the Left constantly attack the problem as one of a free market shortcoming. (See the Earl J. Weinreb NewsHole® comments and @BusinessNewshole at Twitter.)
No comments:
Post a Comment