Much global warming research has actually been suspect for some time, because the mathematical models used are deficient. There is not sufficient computer capability, nor is there enough accurate data for necessary input.
Though warming proof is poor, those who believe in global warming theory insist that the information they have has to be considered in its entirety, no matter the cost of implementation of what data they have.
All of which can be economically devastating.
However, research is being done to see if some of the major legitimate climatic defects can be corrected quickly and at lower cost. Such as the use of an sulphur dioxide in-the-upper-atmosphere approach at minimal cost.
But the industry built around global warming pessimism does not want to hear of such smaller but valued corrective measures, if any are truly necessary. And much of the data has been found to have been falsified or “adapted.”
There is simply too much politics involved. Global warming controls translate into government controls, the chief handle being the use of the taxation tool.
No comments:
Post a Comment